![]() |
| Contact Us | Downloads | News October 1, 2008 | Search |
Industry News Coverage - 2003 ArchiveBelow is a comprehensive monthly review of the news and other media's coverage of OVAL. A brief summary of each news item is listed with its title, author (if identified), date, and media source. December 2003
Date: 12/4/2003 Byline: William Jackson Excerpt or Summary: The author also mentions the role CVE names and candidates play in the OVAL effort, describes what CVE is and CVE Compatibility, and notes that "Both the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the Defense Department recommend that agencies give preference to CVE-compatible products." The author also includes the current number of entries on the CVE List: "[CVE] now contains about 2,572 entries, with another 3,832 under evaluation." The article concludes with the following statement about OVAL: "Although testing and scanning tools are becoming common for discovering vulnerabilities in computer systems, there are no standards for these tasks. OVAL will provide standards so that automating vulnerability management can be more effective, Martin said. It will define the attributes needed to find vulnerabilities in a system, to prioritize them and fix them." November 2003
Date: 11/2003 Byline: Matthew Wojcik, Tiffany Bergeron, Todd Wittbold, and Robert Roberge Excerpt or Summary: August 2003
Date: 8/2003 Byline: Robert Roberge Excerpt or Summary: June 2003
Date: 6/2003 Byline: Alison Stern-Dunyak Excerpt or Summary: March 2003
Date: 3/2003 Byline: Terry Costlow Excerpt or Summary: The author quotes Jay Beale, team leader of the Center for Internet Security, and R&D vice president at Stutzman Pierce, a Baltimore consulting group: "OVAL has the potential to make keeping track of known vulnerabilities actually manageable. While it won't do an analysis of the impact of a vulnerability to your organization or discover new vulnerabilities, OVAL can be more comprehensive than these existing approaches." The article also discusses how OVAL addresses two major issues for network managers. This first is false positives, which occur when one test program determines that an error is present when it is not, "forcing managers to spend hours deciding whether they should fix the problem and how to do so. By adding more structure to tests, OVAL should eliminate many false positives." The second issue is that "end users presently don't know why [scanning] programs give their results, so those trying to fix them don't know which test program to use or whether they need to apply an available software patch. With OVAL, these problems should be a thing of the past." Regarding community participation, the author says: ". . . OVAL's big benefit is that it provides another avenue for [technologists and programmers] to share ideas. Many of these companies are working on the same problems at the same time, developing proprietary ideas. At times this work is redundant; at other times, the ideas could be enhanced if more programmers were aware of them." The author also states: "Once these programmers use OVAL to create tools for locating vulnerabilities, their customers should find it much easier to prevent viruses, worms, and hackers from wreaking havoc on their systems." February 2003
Date: 2/2003 Byline: Keith Regan Excerpt or Summary: The author describes how OVAL works as a community effort and quotes MITRE project leader Margie Zuk on the part OVAL plays: "It's the logical next step. CVE was the beginning of trying to bring some order, and [OVAL] is aimed at improving things." The author then includes a quote by OVAL Editor Matt Wojcik, who states: "One of the problems now is there's such a large amount of information that's exchanged at a general level. At the same time, there isn't a lot of detailed technical information about how to detect if that vulnerability exists on your network." The author notes that OVAL addresses this problem, and then explains that OVAL also addresses the issue of system administrators running various diagnostic software programs to determine if vulnerabilities are present but then getting different answers from the different programs. The author concludes the article with a quote from co-creator and editor of the CVE List Steve Christey, who states: "[OVAL] brings us one step closer to demystifying and improving how vulnerabilities can be detected on computer systems. It raises the bar by actually creating a bar." Page Last Updated: June 09, 2006 |
|
|||||||